Sweet chestnut

Further Reading

Chestnut t206

  • Allergen search puff


    Search ImmunoCAP allergens and allergen components. Note that all information is in English.

Code: f299
Latin name: Castanea sativa
Source material: Shelled nuts
Family: Fagaceae
Common names: Sweet chestnut, European chestnut, Spanish chestnut

Allergen Exposure

Geographical distribution

Sweet Chestnut is a shade-tolerant deciduous tree native to southeastern Europe, Asia Minor, and North Africa. Several edible species of Chestnut are grown around world, the 4 main species being Sweet chestnut (C. sativa), Chinese chestnut (C. mollissima), Japanese chestnut (C. crenata), and American chestnut (C. dentata). American chestnut has been decimated by parasites. China, Korea and Italy are the world's largest producers of Chestnuts. The principal European producers are Italy, Spain, Portugal, France, and Greece.

The tree can attain a height of 35 m and a trunk diameter of 2 m. The bark is deeply grooved or fissured in a net-shaped (retiform) pattern, sometimes in a spiral. The flowers of both sexes are borne in 10-20 cm-long, upright catkins, the male flowers in the upper part of the tree and the female flowers in the lower part. By autumn the female flowers, in bunches of 2 or 3 (and up to 7), develop into light-green fruit cupules (husks) covered with sharp spines; each cupule usually contains 2 dark, shiny, red-brown nuts and, with the nuts ripened, is shed during October. Trees start to bear nuts when 30-40 years old.

Raw nuts have a bitter taste from tannins, which improves considerably with cooking, developing into a sweet and nutty flavour, with a texture like a firm baked potato - unlike other nuts, which are crunchy. Chestnuts, unlike other nuts, contain very little fat or oil (2-3%), compared to over 50%; they consist mainly of complex carbohydrate (50%) and water (40-45%), with small amounts of protein (5-10%). They contain no cholesterol. They have been part of the staple diet and a major source of complex carbohydrate in Southern Europe, Turkey and Asia for centuries.


Edible Chestnuts have been grown for culinary purposes for centuries and can be consumed fresh, boiled, grilled, or roasted. They can be frozen or pureed for desserts or confectionery, or used in stuffing or as a garnish. Dried Chestnuts should be soaked in water, cooked, and then treated as fresh.

Traditionally, Chestnuts are roasted over an open fire or in the oven. They can be dried, ground and used as flour in breads and puddings, or as a thickener in soups. The roasted nut can be a coffee substitute. Some notable specialties include porridge (Italy) and Chestnuts preserved in sugar (marron glacé, a French delicacy). The Corsican variety of polenta is made with Sweet chestnut flour. A variety of Corsican beer has Chestnut as one of its ingredients.


Chestnut is the third most-prevalent food allergen among both adult and pediatric allergy patients in Korea. At least 21 IgE-binding components have been isolated, and 9 protein bands appear to be major allergens. A heat- and digestion-labile 24 kDa protein with homology to a legume protein of Oak acorn was reported to have the highest binding intensity (1). The 24 kDa component bound to more than 50% of asymptomatic Chestnut-sensitised subjects, with minimal binding in symptomatic Chestnut-sensitised subjects; and a component of 29 kDa bound to more than 50% of symptomatic Chestnut-sensitised subjects, with minimal binding in asymptomatic Chestnut-sensitised subjects. A later study further evaluated these 2 components, the 24 and 29 kDa allergens. Simulated gastric digestion decreased IgE binding of the most significant allergens, except the 24 kDa one, while minimal changes were noted to occur through SIF (intestinal enzymes). Boiling treatment could decrease IgE binding components of the most significant allergens, including the 24kDa one (2).

To date, the following allergens have been characterised:

  • Cas s 5, a chitinase, an approximately 32 kDa protein, a major allergen (3-9).
  • rCas s 5 (3).
  • Cas s 8, a Lipid Transfer Protein, a 9.7 kDa protein, a major allergen (10-12).

Cas s 5 belongs to the Class I chitinases, enzymes that contain an N-terminal hevein-like domain homologous to Latex hevein (Hev b 6.02), and a larger catalytic domain. They are the major panallergens in fruits associated with Latex-fruit syndrome (3,5,9). Recombinant Cas s 5 is homologous to its natural counterpart (3).

Although Chestnut allergy is strongly associated with Latex-fruit syndrome, Chesnut allergy may occur independently of this syndrome and has been attributed to the presence of Cas s 8, a Lipid Transfer Protein. In a study of 12 patients sensitised to Chestnut but not to Latex, along with 3 control patients with Latex-Chestnut allergy, a Lipid Transfer Protein was isolated and found to bind to serum-specific IgE in 91% (as shown by IgE immunoblotting) and 58% (as shown by ELISA) of sera from patients with Chestnut but not Latex allergy. Sixty-six percent of these patients had positive skin prick test responses to Cas s 8. Allergenic LTPs from Peach fruit and Artemisia vulgaris pollen were also reactive. In contrast, Avocado class I chitinase and Latex hevein, allergens associated with Latex-fruit syndrome, showed no reaction. The authors suggested that LTPs and class I chitinases can be used as diagnostic tools in patients with Chestnut allergy, to predict whether an associated Latex sensitisation and a risk of cross-reactivity with other plant foods and pollens exist (7).

Cas s 1 and 2 other allergens, an IPR-protein and a profilin, have been isolated from the pollen of European chestnut tree but have not to date been shown to be present in Sweet chestnut (13).

Potential cross-reactivity

Approximately 30-50% of individuals who are allergic to Natural rubber latex (NRL) show an associated hypersensitivity to a number of plant-derived foods, especially freshly consumed fruits (14-17). Some authors have called this the Latex-fruit syndrome, and foods associated include Avocado, Banana, Sweet Chestnut, Kiwi, Peach, Tomato, Potato and Bell pepper (in approximate decreasing order of relevance). Fig, Pineapple and Peanut have also been implicated (18-21). A number of plant protein families have been shown to be involved in Latex-fruit syndrome. Two of these are also pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins. Class I chitinases have been identified as a major category of IgE-binding allergens for patients allergic to NRL. A beta-1,3-glucanase was identified as an important Latex allergen that shows cross-reactivity with proteins of Bell pepper. Another important NRL allergen, Hev b 7, is a patatin-like protein that shows cross-reactivity with its analogous protein in Potato (19). Furthermore, patients with allergy to plant-derived foods and associated pollen allergy show a high frequency of IgE reactivity to the panallergen profilin. However, whether Latex sensitisation precedes or follows the onset of food allergy has not been resolved (16).

Allergy to Chestnuts has been widely reported in connection to Latex-fruit syndrome. However, few studies address actual allergy to Chestnuts in patients reacting primarily to this food. In this study, 22 consecutive subjects with proven allergy to Chestnut (according to DBPCFC or a convincing history of anaphylaxis) were studied. The age of onset of reactions to Chestnut ranged from 5 to 70 years, with 8/22 (36%) patients having experienced severe anaphylactic episodes. SPTs with Chestnut were positive in 71%, and IgE antibodies were detected in 54% of patients. Eighty-six percent and 59% of patients also had positive responses to pollen and Latex allergens, respectively. Eighteen patients had actual allergy to other foods, of which these were the main ones: Banana, in 45% of patients; Avocado, in 40%; and Hazel nut, in 32%. There was a significant association between sensitisation to Latex and clinical reactivity to Avocado and/or Kiwi (p<0.01); while reactivity to Hazel nut was associated with allergy to Peanut (p=0.003) and Walnut (p<0.001) (22).

In a study of 47 Latex-allergic patients, immunological reactivity to foods was found in 33. Seventeen patients manifested a clinical allergy to at least 1 food, including 11 patients with anaphylaxis and 14 with local sensitivity reactions. Positive food skin tests occurred most frequently with Avocado (53%), Potato (40%), Banana (38%), Tomato (28%), Chestnut (28%), and Kiwi (17%) (19).

Chestnut and Natural rubber latex (NRL) allergy are often associated in Latex-fruit syndrome. This study's aim was to establish whether concurrent NRL and Chestnut IgE antibody reactivity are the results of co-sensitisation or cross-reactivity.

Sera from 19 patients with Chestnut- and NRL-specific IgE were selected and tested for reactivity with recombinant (r) Latex allergens. IgE-antibodies were detected to rHev b 6.01 (prohevein) in 58% of the sera, to rHev b 5 in 32%, to rHev b 12 in 4 of 13 sera, to rHev b 7.02 and rHev b 11 in 4, and to rHev b 1 in 2 of 19 sera. rHev b 8-IgE antibodies were found in 9 sera (47%), whereas 6 displayed monosensitisation to rHev b 8 with regard to the test panel. Three of 16 sera showed IgE to cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants. In most sera recognising rHev b 5 and/or rHev b 6.01 as major allergens, the IgE reactivity to NRL remained unaffected by Chestnut extract, and Chestnut IgE remained unaffected by NRL extract. Conversely, in sera with rHev b 8 as the dominant allergen, IgE-binding to NRL was nearly completely inhibited by Chestnut and vice versa. IgE-binding to rHev b 8 was abolished by Chestnut extract. The study concludes that although patients have concomitant IgE antibody reactivity to Chestnut and NRL, cross-reactivity could be demonstrated mainly in those patients with IgE to Hev b 8 (profilin) from NRL (23).

However, the prevalence of combined NRL and Chestnut allergy may vary according to the population in question and may be very low in some groups. Among 137 patients with NRL allergy, food allergy to Chestnut was reported in only 1 patient. (24) In a Taiwanese screening program to identify Latex-sensitised hospital employees, elevated serum total IgE was found in 22(16.9%) of 130 nurses, 3(16.7%) of whom had increased Latex-specific IgE, further confirmed by SPT determination. No cross-reactive fruit allergy (Melon, Banana, Kiwi, Tomato, or Chestnut) was found among the Latex-sensitised nurses (25).

Of the plant protein families, a Class I chitinase containing an N-terminal hevein-like domain homologous to and cross-reacting with hevein (Hev b 6.02) has been shown to be a major panallergen responsible for Latex-fruit syndrome involving cross-reactivity among Chestnut, Banana and Avocado (5-6,9,14-15,26-28). Class I chitinases have also been detected in Cherimoya, Passion fruit, Kiwi, Papaya, Mango, Tomato, and Wheat flour extracts (29). Cross-reactivity is modulated due to chitinase in the Latex plant (Hev b 11), which displays 70% identity to the endochitinase from Avocado and its hevein domain, and 58% to hevein in Latex (Hev b 6.02). Hev b 11, a class I chitinase, displays a different IgE binding capacity than hevein (4).

A review of 28 cases of sensitisation to Latex showed that Banana- and Chestnut-induced allergies were the allergies most frequently associated with Latex-induced allergy (30). In a study of 25 patients with Latex allergy (9 [36%] with anaphylaxis), 13 (52%) were found to have concomitant food allergies to a total of 42 foods, of which 23 had caused systemic anaphylaxis. The most frequent food hypersensitivities were to Avocado (n=9), Chestnut (n=9), Banana (n=7), Kiwi (n=5) and Papaya (n=3). Cross-reactivity among Latex, Avocado, Chestnut, and Banana was demonstrated (31).

A report was made of 8 patients allergic to Latex and Fruit (Chestnut and Banana), 4 of whom had experienced anaphylaxis following ingestion of the fruit. In the 6 patients with symptoms after eating Chestnuts, SPT for Chestnut was found in 5. Histamine release to Chestnuts was positive in 3 of the 6. One patient with no skin reactivity to Chestnut, but showing IgE antibodies in serum tests, tolerated the fruit. Other case reports are illustrative of Chestnut allergy. Patient 1, a 32-year-old housewife, experienced itching of the mouth, rhinitis, and facial angioedema 30 minutes after eating a raw Chestnut. Patient 2, a 23-year-old sister of Patient 1, developed itching of the palate, sneezing, nasal discharge and asthma 10 minutes after eating Chestnuts. Patient 4, a 20-year-old housewife, 10 minutes after ingestion of Bananas and Chestnuts, developed asthma, rhinitis and urticaria. Patient 6, a 23-year-old woman student, experienced anaphylactic episodes (general urticaria, angioedema, and asthma) following the ingestion of Chestnuts and Bananas. Patient 7, a 42-year-old housewife, had an anaphylactic reaction after eating Chestnuts. Patient 8, a 17-year-old female student, developed generalised urticaria and angioedema with laryngeal involvement after eating Chestnuts, and ingestion of Banana caused itching of the mouth (32).

Similarly, a report describes an 8-year-old boy, with a number of previous surgical procedures, who developed acute episodes of urticaria following contact with NRL, and then angioedema and dry cough after ingestion of Chesnuts. SPT for Latex and Chestnut was positive. IgE antibodies were detected to Latex but not to Chestnut. Open oral challenge with Chestnut was positive: 15 minutes after ingestion of 0.5 g of Chestnut, he developed bouts of sneezing, dry cough, perioral itching and erythema, and isolated facial wheals (20).

However, not all studies indicate that sensitisation to Chestnut, or cross-reactivity between Latex and Chestnut, is clinically relevant. For example, in a Turkish study investigating the prevalence of Latex and Latex-associated food sensitivities among hospital employees and atopic children – 61 hospital employees and 40 atopic children – allergen-specific IgE evaluation confirmed sensitisation to NRL in 30 subjects, but not all were symptomatic. Chestnut sensitisation was demonstrated in 37, but whether these individuals displayed allergic symptoms for Chestnut was not investigated; yet the implication that sensitisation may occur without allergic expression is apparent (33). Other authors concur, suggesting that serologic tests seem to be of low significance for prediction of food allergy in Latex-allergic patients, and that in many cases, sensitisation occurs with no clinical expression (15,34).

Cross-reactivity has also been described between Avocado and Chestnut. In a study of 17 patients with immediate hyper-sensitivity to Avocado, common antigenic determinants were shown to exist among Avocado, Latex, Chestnut, and Banana extracts (35). Recent knowledge suggests that the panallergen chitinase may have been responsible.

Although Chestnut allergy is strongly associated with Latex-fruit syndrome, Chesnut allergy may occur independently of this syndrome and has been attributed to the presence of Cas s 8, a Lipid Transfer Protein (7). Cross-reactivity with other foods containing LTPs is therefore possible. In a study evaluating, by means of SPT, the reactivity to LTPs from Peach, Apple, Chestnut and Artemisia pollen, Chestnut LTP was reported to be less cross-reactive than Apple and Peach LTPs. In a group of Peach-allergic individuals, the most frequent pattern of cross-reactivity of LTPs was the combination Peach-Apple (45%), followed by Peach-Apple-Artemisia-Chestnut (21%). Significant correlations were found between Peach and Apple LTPs, and between Artemisia and Chestnut LTPs. Positive SPTs to Chestnut LTP were observed only in patients with positive SPTs to Artemisia LTP. All the patients with positive case histories to Chestnut reacted to Chestnut LTP. (11) This is in particular relevant in Rosaceae fruit-allergic populations in the Mediterranean area, where LTPs have been identified as major allergens, especially in Apple and Peach. Purified LTPs from Artemisia pollen and from Chestnut meat have a 43-50% sequence identity with the equivalent allergens of Apple and Peach. A similar degree of sequence identity (50%) was found between the Artemisia and Chestnut proteins. Therefore, although LTPs from Artemisia pollen and Chestnut cross-react with LTPs of Rosaceae fruits, significant differences in specific IgE-binding capacities have been noted among members of the plant LTP family (10).

The study also demonstrated that Latex-allergic patients (23%) recognise a protein with sequence homology to the protein family patatin, known to be an important protein in Potato. Cross-reactivity between Latex and several Potato proteins was observed through immunoblot inhibition analysis (19).

In 4 patients with an allergy to Ficus benjamina, 2 patients had a cross-allergy to NRL and the associated cluster of tropical fruit (Banana, Kiwi, Avocado, and Chestnut) (36).

The enzymes Papain and Bromelain may share epitopes with Chestnut allergens (14,26).

According to a report of a 4-year-old boy who developed allergic symptoms immediately after peeling and eating an Oak acorn, partial cross-reactivity was demonstrated between Oak acorn and Chestnut (37).

Clinical Experience

IgE-mediated reactions

Allergy to Chestnut on its own is infrequent, considering how common Chestnut consumption is in certain countries (38); but Chestnut allergy is more frequently associated with the complex sensitisation of NRL-allergic individuals to fruits and vegetables (14-17,24). However, it may be that allergy to Chestnut is underreported, since the possibility of allergic disease tends to be insufficiently investigated. In a Korean study evaluating the clinical significance of Chestnut as a food allergen in 1,738 patients with respiratory allergies, skin reactivity to Chestnut was found in 56 (3.2%) (1).

A study investigating the prevalence of NRL sensitisation and allergy in 74 children with atopic dermatitis reported that 12 of the 74 atopic children had IgE antibodies to Latex. Twenty children without proven Latex sensitisation showed increased food-specific IgE, most frequently to Potato, Banana, and Chestnut (39).

Oral allergy syndrome induced by Chestnut, followed by rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma, has been described in a 22-year-old woman. She reported that when chewing Chestnut, she had felt a burning sensation and itching of the oropharyngeal mucosa followed by lacrimation, nasal pruritus, violent sneezing salvos, and “moderate” difficulty in breathing, but not severe enough to require treatment. Symptoms initially had been relatively minor and limited to oral ones, but subsequent episodes became progressively worse. The challenge with fresh food was positive. Skin prick test with a commercial product and the prick-by-prick method with fresh Chestnut were negative. Skin prick testing with a freshly prepared extract of fresh Chestnut, and the passive transfer reaction, were positive. Serum tests were negative (40).

Four cases of nurses with allergy to NRL followed by anaphylaxis to Chestnut were reported. The presence of Chestnut sensitivity was demonstrated by positive SPT, but IgE antibodies to Chestnut were found in only 2, suggesting that anaphylaxis to Chestnut is possible even in the absence of serum IgE antibodies to Chestnut (41). Anaphylaxis to Chestnut may be classified as “idiopathic” until investigated further (42).

A 4-year-old boy developed ocular itching, eyelid and lip angioedema, unproductive cough, wheezing and dyspnoea immediately after peeling and eating an Oak acorn. Months later, he experienced similar symptoms after eating a Chestnut. He tolerated Latex and Banana. SPT was positive to Oak acorn peel and Chestnut, and negative to the pollen. The IgE antibody level was raised for Chestnut and Oak acorn peel, with a degree of cross-reactivity demonstrated between these foods (37).

Chestnut has been reported to cause urticaria-angioedema in a 29-year-old man (43).

Other reactions

Chestnut tree pollen is an aeroallergen (44).

The Horse chestnut, Aesculus hippo-castanum, is an entirely different tree from the Sweet chestnut. The Horse chestnut is not edible; its burs have blunt spikes, while Sweet chestnut burs are very sharp and spiny.

Compiled by Dr Harris Steinman, harris@zingsolutions.com


  1. Lee SK, Yoon SH, Kim SH, Choi JH, Park HS. Chestnut as a food allergen: identification of major allergens.
    J Korean Med Sci 2005;20(4):573-8
  2. Lee S. Chestnut as a food allergen: Identification of the major allergens and effect of gastric and intestinal fluids.
    J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004:113:S234
  3. Diaz-Perales A, Sanchez-Monge R, Blanco C, Lombardero M, Carillo T, Salcedo G. What is the role of the hevein-like domain of fruit class I chitinases in their allergenic capacity? Clin Exp Allergy 2002;32(3):448-54
  4. O'Riordain G, Radauer C, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K, Adhami F, et al. Cloning and molecular characterization of the Hevea brasiliensis allergen Hev b 11, a class I chitinase.
    Clin Exp Allergy 2002;32(3):455-62
  5. Sanchez-Monge R, Blanco C, Diaz-Perales A, Collada C, Carrillo T, Aragoncillo C, Salcedo G. Isolation and characterization of major banana allergens: identification as fruit class I chitinases.
    Clin Exp Allergy 1999;29(5):673-80
  6. Diaz-Perales A, Collada C, Blanco C, Sanchez-Monge R, Carrillo T, Aragoncillo C, Salcedo G. Class I chitinases with hevein-like domain, but not class II enzymes, are relevant chestnut and avocado allergens.
    J Allergy Clin Immunol 1998;102(1):127-33
  7. Sanchez-Monge R, Blanco C, Lopez-Torrejon G, Cumplido J, Recas M, Figueroa J, Carrillo T, Salcedo G. Differential allergen sensitization patterns in chestnut allergy with or without associated latex-fruit syndrome.
    J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006;118(3):705-10
  8. Breiteneder H, Ebner C Molecular and biochemical classification of plant-derived food allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000;106(1 Pt 1):27-36
  9. Blanco C, Diaz-Perales A, Collada C, Sanchez-Monge R, Aragoncillo C, Castillo R, Ortega N, Alvarez M, Carrillo T, Salcedo G. Class I chitinases as potential panallergens involved in the latex-fruit syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;103(3 Pt 1):507-13
  10. Diaz-Perales A, Lombardero M, Sanchez-Monge R, Garcia-Selles FJ, Pernas M, Fernandez-Rivas M, Barber D, Salcedo G. Lipid-transfer proteins as potential plant panallergens: cross-reactivity among proteins of Artemisia pollen, Castanea nut and Rosaceae fruits, with different IgE-binding capacities.
    Clin Exp Allergy 2000;30(10):1403-10
  11. Garcia-Selles FJ, Diaz-Perales A, Sanchez-Monge R, Alcantara M, et al. Patterns of reactivity to lipid transfer proteins of plant foods and Artemisia pollen: an in vivo study. An in vivo Study. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2002;128(2):115-22
  12. Asero R, Mistrello G, Roncarolo D, Amato S. Detection of some safe plant-derived foods for LTP-allergic patients. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2007;144(1):57-63
  13. Hirschwehr R, Jager S, Horak F, Ferreira F, Valenta R, et al. Allergens from birch pollen and pollen of the European chestnut share common epitopes.
    Clin Exp Allergy 1993;23(9):755-61
  14. Latasa M, Dieguez I, Sanz ML, Parra A, Pajaron MJ, Oehling A. Fruit sensitization in patients with allergy to latex. J Invest Allergol Clin Immunol 1995;5(2):97-102
  15. Brehler R, Theissen U, Mohr C, Luger T. “Latex-fruit syndrome”: frequency of cross-reacting IgE antibodies.
    Allergy 1997;52(4):404-10
  16. Wagner S, Breiteneder H. The latex-fruit syndrome.
    Biochem Soc Trans 2001;30(6):935-40
  17. Bayrou O. Latex allergy. [French] Rev Prat 2006;56(3):289-95
  18. Ebo DG, Bridts CH, Hagendorens MM, De Clerck LS, Stevens WJ. The prevalence and diagnostic value of specific IgE antibodies to inhalant, animal and plant food, and ficus allergens in patients with natural rubber latex allergy. Acta Clin Belg 2003;58(3):183-9
  19. Beezhold DH, Sussman GL, Liss GM, Chang NS. Latex allergy can induce clinical reactions to specific foods.
    Clin Exp Allergy 1996;26(4):416-22
  20. Anibarro B, Garcia-Ara MC, Pascual C. Associated sensitization to latex and chestnut. Allergy 1993;48(2):130-1
  21. Rodriguez M, Vega F, Garcia MT, Panizo C, et al. Hypersensitivity to latex, chestnut, and banana. Ann Allergy 1993;70(1):31-4
  22. Rico P, Crespo JF, Feliu A, Rodriguez J. Chestnut allergy: Beyond the latex-fruit syndrome.
    J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004:113:S149
  23. Raulf-Heimsoth M, Kespohl S, Crespo JF, Rodriguez J, Feliu A, Bruning T, Rihs HP. Natural rubber latex and chestnut allergy: cross-reactivity or co-sensitization?
    Allergy 2007;62(11):1277-81
  24. Kim KT, Hussain H. Prevalence of food allergy in 137 latex-allergic patients.
    Allergy Asthma Proc 1999;20(2):95-7
  25. Wan KS, Lue HC. Latex allergy in health care workers in Taiwan: prevalence, clinical features. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2007;80(5):455-7
  26. Serrano L, Pérez Camo I, Durán MA, Madera JF, Cuevas M, Hinojosa M. Allergy to latex and tropical fruits with associated hypersensitivity to enzymes: case report.
    Allergy 1995;26(50):236-P-0462
  27. Velázquez E, González-Pol J, Durán S, Gámez R, Escribano MM, Guardia P, de la Calle A, Conde J. Allergy to latex and fruits.
    Eur J Allergy and Clin Immunol Suppl 1997;37(52):122-375
  28. Blanco C. Latex-fruit syndrome.
    Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2003;3(1):47-53
  29. Diaz-Perales A, Collada C, Blanco C, Sanchez-Monge R, et al. Cross-reactions in the latex-fruit syndrome: A relevant role of chitinases but not of complex asparagine-linked glycans. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;104(3 Pt 1):681-7
  30. Moreno Ancillo A, Lopez Serrano MC, Barranco Sanz P, Dominguez Noche C, Ornia Fernandez N, Martinez Alzamora F. Latex sensitization in 28 patients. [Spanish] Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1994;22(6):275-80
  31. Blanco C, Carrillo T, Castillo R, Quiralte J, Cuevas M. Latex allergy: clinical features and cross-reactivity with fruits.
    Ann Allergy 1994;73(4):309-14
  32. Fernandez de Corres L, Moneo I, Munoz D, et al. Sensitization from chestnuts and bananas in patients with urticaria and anaphylaxis from contact with latex.
    Ann Allergy 1993;70:35-9
  33. Saraclar Y, Cetinkaya F, Tuncer A, Sekerel B, Hovanec-Burns D, Unver E. Latex sensitivity among hospital employees and atopic children. Turk J Pediatr 1998;40(1):61-8
  34. Monreal P, Server MT, et al. Hipersensitivity to fruits in latex allergic patients. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1996;24(1):33-5
  35. Blanco C, Carrillo T, Castillo R, Quiralte J, Cuevas M. Avocado hypersensitivity.
    Allergy 1994;49:454-9
  36. van Ginkel CJ, Dijkstra AT, van Eyk CL, den Hengst CW, Bruijnzeel-Koomen CA. Allergy to Ficus benjamina: at the workplace and at home. [Dutch] Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1997;141(16):782-4
  37. Zapatero L, Baeza ML, Sierra Z, Molero MI. Anaphylaxis by fruits of the Fagaceae family: acorn and chestnut. Allergy 2005;60(12):12
  38. Roux KH, Teuber SS, Sathe SK. Tree nut allergens. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2003;131(4):234-44
  39. Tucke J, Posch A, Baur X, Rieger C, Raulf-Heimsoth M. Latex type I sensitization and allergy in children with atopic dermatitis. Evaluation of cross-reactivity to some foods. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 1999;10(3):160-7
  40. Antico A. Oral allergy syndrome induced by chestnut (Castanea sativa).
    Ann Allergy 1996;76(1):37-40
  41. Tomitaka A, Matsunaga K, Akita H, Suzuki K, Ueda H. Four cases with latex allergy followed by anaphylaxis to chestnut. [Japanese] Arerugi 2000;49(4):327-34
  42. Stricker WE, Anorve-Lopez E, Reed CE. Food skin testing in patients with idiopathic anaphylaxis.
    J Allergy Clin Immunol 1986;77:516-9
  43. Estrada JL, Gozalo F, Cecchini C, Casquete E. Contact urticaria from hops (Humulus lupulus) in a patient with previous urticaria-angioedema from peanut, chestnut and banana. Contact Dermatitis 2002;46(2):127
  44. Laurent J, Lafay M, Lattanzi B, Legall C, Sauvaget J. Evidence for Chestnut Pollinosis in Paris. Clin Exp Allergy 1993;23:1;29-43

As in all diagnostic testing, the diagnosis is made by the physican based on both test results and the patient history.