Latin name: Amaranthus retroflexus
Source material: Pollen
Common names: Common Pigweed, Redroot Pigweed
Note: Lamb’s quarters (Chenopodium album) is occasionally also called Pigweed or Smooth pigweed but does not belong to the Amaranthaceae family. There is a particular resemblance in the cotyledon stage, but Lamb’s quarters cotyledons often have a mealy grey cast and the first true leaves are alternate, unlike those of any of the Pigweed species.
The Amaranth family comprises about 40 genera and 475 species. They are mostly weedy herbs though some genera are low or climbing shrubs. The flowers of all are characterised by extreme simplicity. Some species are wind pollinated whereas others are insect pollinated. The flowers may be monoecious or dioecious, but they are always small, often greenish or yellowish (1).
The Amaranthus genus is annual herbs. The genus comprises about 50 species of which about 35 are native to North America (1). The genus includes Common pigweed, Powell amaranth, Prostrate pigweed, and Tumble pigweed, the most common of these being Common pigweed. Pigweeds are annual plants that germinate from seeds from late winter through summer.
Common pigweed is a common weed found throughout the world, in particular in Europe, the USA, Brazil, Korea, Spain, Mozambique, Mexico, Hungary, Germany, and Afghanistan.
Common pigweed is an erect summer annual that may reach 2 m in height. The stems are stout, erect, and branched, usually with short hairs, especially near the upper portions of the plant. The plant has a shallow taproot that is often reddish in colour.
The leaves are grey-green and oval-spearhead-shaped, and covered with dense, coarse hair. Red or light-green stripes run the length of the tall main stem. Seeds are in bushy spikes at the top of the plant and in the axils of the leaves. Although Pigweed is primarily an upright grower, it will lie near the ground with constant mowing.
The flowers are greenish-grey and incon-spicuous, and are produced in dense, compact, terminal panicles that are approximately 2 cm wide and from 5 to 20 cm in length. They are mixed with bristle-like bracts. Smaller inflorescences also occur between the stem and the leaf axils. Male and female flowers occur on the same plant (i.e., the structure is monoecious). Common pigweed flowers in high summer and fall, very shortly after germination, and deposits thousands of seeds during a single season, producing over 100,000 seeds per plant. The seeds are small, shiny, and black.
Careless weed (Palmer Amaranth) (Amaranthus palmeri) also resembles Common and Smooth pigweed, but the terminal panicles of this species are much longer and narrower. Common pigweed is also often confused with other Pigweed species.
The Common pigweed is found in horticultural, nursery, and agronomic crops, wild landscapes, roadsides, and also in pastures and forages.
North American Indians used A. retroflexus for flour and warm drinks.
Pigweed contains a nephrotoxin that causes kidney failure. It also contains soluble oxalates and is capable of accumulating nitrates. Toxicity can be due to a combination of these causes.
A 14 kDa and a 35 kDa allergen have been identified, but the allergens have not yet been fully characterised (2-3).
An extensive cross-reactivity among the different individual species of the genus could be expected, as well as to a certain degree among members of the family Amaranthaceae (4) and Chenopodiaceae (2). Atriplex latifolia, Beta vulgaris, Salsola kali and Amaranthus retroflexus were compared with an extract from Chenopodium album by both in vivo and in vitro methods. The study’s results suggest that common allergenic determinants are present (2).
In a study using a fluorescent allergosorbent test, similar antigenic determinants were found between Short ragweed and Giant ragweed, Cocklebur, Lamb’s quarters, Rough pigweed, Marsh elder, and Goldenrod. Cocklebur and Giant ragweed were highly potent in competitively binding to short ragweed IgE. The other pollens demonstrated lower potency of cross-reacting antigens (5).
Common pigweed pollen commonly induces asthma, allergic rhinitis and allergic conjunctivitis (6-9).
Pigweed pollen has been shown to be a common aeroallergen in the Midwestern USA (10), the Tampa Bay area, Florida (11), St. Louis, Missouri (12), and in Lincoln, Nebraska, USA (13). In a study examining aeroallergen sensitisation rates in military children in Texas undergoing skin testing for rhinitis, of 209 patients, 27% were sensitised to Common pigweed or the closely related Careless weed (A. palmeri) (9).
Pigweed pollen is also an important aeroallergen in Salamanca, Spain (14). In the central region of Coahuila, Spain, 5.4% of allergic individuals were sensitised to this pollen (6). Common pigweed pollen has been reported in Burgos, Spain (15).
In Mexico (16), Israel (17) and North China (7), Pigweed is a major contributor to the aeroallergen load. In Thailand, 16% of patients with allergic rhinitis were Pigweed-sensitised (5). In an assessment of allergic diseases and sensitisation in people aged 65 and over in Mexico, 3.6% were sensitised to Common pigweed (18).
- Wodehouse RP. Hayfever Plants. 2nd revised edition. Hafner Publishing Co., NY, USA. 1971
- Wurtzen PA, Nelson HS, Lowenstein H, Ipsen H. Characterization of Chenopodiales (Amaranthus retroflexus, Chenopodium album, Kochia scoparia, Salsola pestifer) pollen allergens.
- Lombardero M, Duffort O, Selles JG, Hernandez J, Carreira J. Cross-reactivity among Chenopodiaceae and Amaranthaceae.
Ann Allergy 1985;54(5):430-6
- Yman L. Botanical relations and immunological cross-reactions in pollen allergy. 2nd ed. Pharmacia Diagnostics AB. Uppsala. Sweden. 1982: ISBN 91-970475-09
- Perrick D, Stafford CT, Armstrong E, DuRant RH. Modification of the fluorescent allergosorbent test as an inhibition assay for determination of cross-reactivity among aeroallergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1991;87(1 Pt 1):98-103
- Pumhirun P, Towiwat P, Mahakit P. Aeroallergen sensitivity of Thai patients with allergic rhinitis. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 1997;15(4):183-5
- Ramos Morin CJ, Canseco Gonzalez C. Hypersensitivity to airborne allergens common in the central region of Coahuila. [Spanish] Rev Alerg Mex 1994;41(3):84-7
- Li WK, Wang CS. Survey of air-borne allergic pollens in North China: contamination with ragweed.
N Engl Reg Allergy Proc 1986;7(2):134-43
- Calabria CW, Dice J. Aeroallergen sensitization rates in military children with rhinitis symptoms. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2007;99(2):161-9
- Stokes JR, Hartel R, Ford LB, Casale TB. Cannabis (hemp) positive skin tests and respiratory symptoms. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2000;85(3):238-40
- Bucholtz GA, Lockey RF, Wunderlin RP,
Binford LR, Stablein JJ, Serbousek D, Fernandez-Caldas E. A three-year aerobiologic pollen survey of the Tampa Bay area, Florida.
Ann Allergy 1991;67(5):534-40
- Lewis WH, Imber WE. Allergy epidemiology in the St. Louis, Missouri, area. IV. weeds.
Ann Allergy 1975;35(3):180-7
- Bolick MR. Airborne pollen survey for Lincoln, Nebraska. III. Weeds.
Nebr Med J 1991;76(6):178-81
- Hernandez Prieto M, Lorente Toledano F,
Romo Cortina A, Davila Gonzalez I, Laffond Yges E, Calvo Bullon A. Pollen calendar of the city of Salamanca (Spain). Aeropalynological analysis for 1981-1982 and 1991-1992. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1998;26(5):209-22
- Carretero Anibarro P, Juste Picon S, Garcia Gonzalez F, Alloza Gomez P, Perez Jimenez R,
Blanco Carmona J, Reinares Ten C, Vicente Serrano J, Bascones O. Allergenic pollens and pollinosis in the city of Burgos.
Alergol Inmunol Clin 2005;20(3):90-94
- del Rio Navarro BE, Mercado Ortiz V, Lerma Ortiz L, Montejo Bello M, Gazca Aguilar A, Sienra Monge JJ. Comparison of 2 skin test methods for the diagnosis of allergic diseases. [Spanish] Rev Alerg Mex 1996;43(4):100-3
- Rachmiel M, Waisel Y, Verliger H, Keynan N,
Katz Y. Correlation between exposure to allergenic pollens and allergic manifestations. [Hebrew] Harefuah 1996;130(8):505-11, 584
- Becerril Angeles M, Vazquez Merino C, Angeles Garay U, Alvarado Moctezuma LE, Vilchis Gulzar E. Prevalence of allergic diseases in elderly people.
Rev Alerg Mex 2008;55(3):85-91